The Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre (RULAAC) has strongly opposed and condemned outrightly the disbandment of the Anti Kidnapping Unit (Tiger Base) by the police.
RULAAC described the outlawing of Tiger Base as a cosmetic disbandment and an old wine in a new bottle.
RULAAC in a release signed by Okechukwu Nwanguma, the Executive Director
Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre, made available to the media on Thursday, regretted that the Tiger Base had caused pains on the people haven taken many lives without any justification.
“The Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre (RULAAC) expresses deep concern over the decision by the Nigeria Police Force to disband the notorious “Tiger Base” in Owerri, Imo State, only to inaugurate another tactical police unit operating from the same facility, under substantially the same command structure and reportedly with many of the same operatives.
“This development raises serious questions about the sincerity of ongoing police reform efforts in Nigeria and reinforces fears that what is being presented as reform may merely be a cosmetic rebranding exercise designed to deflect public criticism without addressing the underlying culture of abuse and impunity.
“Tiger Base became widely associated with allegations of torture, enforced disappearances, arbitrary detention, extortion and extrajudicial killings. Over the years, victims, families, lawyers, journalists, and civil society organizations documented disturbing patterns of abuse linked to the operations of the unit.
“Ordinarily, the disbandment of such a notorious tactical outfit should have marked an opportunity for genuine institutional reform. It should have included:
“Independent investigation into allegations of abuse. Accountability for officers implicated in violations;
Justice and reparations for victims; Structural reforms and strengthened oversight. Human rights-centered retraining and professionalization.
“Instead, the establishment of another tactical formation under substantially similar conditions suggests continuity rather than reform.
“RULAAC is particularly concerned that retaining personnel or leadership figures associated with serious allegations of abuse sends a dangerous message that misconduct within the policing system carries no real consequences. This undermines public trust, weakens accountability, and emboldens further violations.
“The situation also raises broader concerns regarding political interference in policing. Tactical police units must never become instruments for political intimidation, repression, or the advancement of partisan interests. Professional policing requires operational independence, transparency, accountability, and strict adherence to constitutional and legal standards.
“The controversy inevitably recalls the aftermath of the #EndSARS protests, when the disbandment of SARS was quickly followed by the creation of SWAT, generating widespread fears that abusive policing structures were merely being renamed rather than fundamentally transformed.
RULAAC reiterates that genuine police reform cannot be achieved through changes in nomenclature alone, as meaningful reform requires accountability, transparency, civilian oversight, institutional culture change and justice for victims.
RULAAC called for the following urgent measures.
“A transparent and independent investigation into allegations against Tiger Base operatives and leadership.
“Prosecution and disciplinary action against officers implicated in torture, unlawful killings and other abuses.
“Justice, compensation, and support for victims and affected families.
“Strengthened civilian oversight involving the National Human Rights Commission, judicial institutions, and civil society organizations.
“Clear operational guidelines and publicly accountable rules of engagement for tactical police units.
“Measures to insulate policing from political interference and abuse.
“The people of Imo State and Nigerians generally deserve a policing system founded on professionalism, legality, accountability and respect for human rights – not the recycling of abusive structures under new labels”, the group maintained.
